↗APPROACH
Grounded Technology means technology grounded in real purposes and conditions. These five questions guide our judgment.
POINT OF VIEW
Use goals and constraints to define priorities, inclusions and exclusions. For exploratory work, define what must be learned to make the next decision.
If dashboard data is stale, investigate integration and updates before adding charts.
POINT OF VIEW
Distinguish reading information from changing business state. Actions bring roles, input validation, feedback and handoffs into scope.
Multiple readers do not automatically need an approval workflow. Identify the actual actions and responsibilities.
POINT OF VIEW
Define who confirms shared records and owns interfaces and changes. More connections do not require merging every responsibility.
Preparation may continue while awaiting confirmation, but its result stays pending until accepted.
POINT OF VIEW
Consider allowed actions, sufficient information and consequences in that order. Human approval cannot replace missing information or execution checks.
Drafting and changing business records are different delegations. Hold execution when information is missing, even if writing is allowed.
POINT OF VIEW
Agree normal use, exceptions, failures, corrections and handover. Match verification depth to the purpose instead of applying the same burden everywhere.
Define realistic questions and information conditions, then connect evaluation to acceptance.
These are judgment principles applied to project conditions. They are not a mandatory sequence or a claim about every historical engagement.
Explore how conditions change the buildYOUR NEXT PROJECT
A new product, connected systems, or work that needs AI.
Start with what you know today.
