Sleep care app UX/UI
App planning · UX/UI · onboarding · UX writing▷ Screen preview
Radar-based sleep care app UX/UI design
Team member’s prior planning and design work
A shared language for design and development
Turn recurring interface patterns into tokens, components and guidance used in the product
Sleep care app UX/UIApp planning · UX/UI · onboarding · UX writing▷ Screen preview
IMPLEMENTATION SCOPE
Shared rules for design and code
Define color, spacing and typography tokens and document component states, inputs and accessibility. Connect design changes to code versioning and releases.
- What we build
- Design tokens · UI components · documentation · acceptance criteria
- What we validate
- Keyboard access, error/loading/disabled states, responsive and visual regression
IN YOUR EVERYDAY WORKThe same action.
The same action.
A consistent experience.
Before listing features, we define the inputs, decisions and next actions in a real working situation.
An illustrative scenario. Specific processing rules are agreed for the project.
Save buttons behave differently across screens.
- Input
- Default · in progress · success · error
- Review
- Keyboard operation and status messages
NEXT ACTION
Use the same state rules in design and code
When this service helps
When screens behave inconsistently or teams rebuild the same patterns
- 1
Audit interfaces and user journeys
- 2
Define tokens, components and states
- 3
Apply them to the product with guidance
What the project delivers
- Design tokens and interface rules
- Agreed design and code components
- Accessibility and change guidance
Specific features, integrations and operating support are agreed in the project proposal
Related work
See the scope, role and supplied interfaces for each project
Technical design and acceptance criteria
Details for technical reviewers. Architecture and acceptance criteria are agreed for the actual environment and project scope.
- DTCG tokens
- Figma variables
- Component contracts
- Accessibility / Visual regression
Processing flow and exceptions
A reference graph connects primitive values to semantic and component tokens. Themes change the semantic layer while components consume role-based references rather than hardcoded colors.
Architecture summary
- Token references — Types, aliases, theme mappings, generated outputs
- Component contract — Figma variants ↔ props, states, events
- Product adoption — Versions, deprecation, and migration guides
02Acceptance criteria
Implementation and acceptance criteria
Concrete design decisions and acceptance scenarios to agree for the project.
Token references
ImplementationTypes, aliases, theme mappings, generated outputs
ValidationCycles, unresolved references, and theme switching
Component contract
ImplementationFigma variants ↔ props, states, events
ValidationLoading, errors, long content, and keyboard use
Product adoption
ImplementationVersions, deprecation, and migration guides
ValidationIntegration checks on representative product screens
Technology choices and acceptance criteria depend on discovery, integrations, and agreed scope. We define reproducible acceptance scenarios and handover evidence for the operating environment.
03Implementation details
Engineering decisions
in detail
From visible features to failure conditions,
we work through the decisions before launch.
Model tokens as a reference graph
Separate primitive, semantic, and component layers with types and aliases for color, spacing, typography, and motion. Assess the DTCG format for interchange and code transformation, validating cycles, unresolved aliases, and invalid types during builds. Express brand and dark-mode variation through semantic mappings rather than scattered screen-level overrides.
Align Figma properties with component contracts
Define size, variant, emphasis, disabled, loading, and error behavior as a component contract. Map Figma variants to code props and use composition when combinations become unmanageable. Documentation environments such as Storybook describe constraints, events, long content, and responsive behavior alongside examples, making the package usable by teams beyond its original authors.
Validate accessibility and regression at component level
Specify keyboard order, focus behavior, accessible names, roles, states, and error associations by pattern. Manually exercise behaviors that automated checks cannot establish, such as dialog focus restoration or combobox navigation. Use selected states, viewports, and themes as visual-regression baselines, with a review process that distinguishes intended changes from defects.
Govern adoption and the cost of change
Maintain package versions, changelogs, deprecation notices, and migration guides. Distinguish token-renaming impact from component API changes and adopt high-use patterns incrementally in existing products. Assign responsibility for proposals, design review, code review, and release so teams have a supported contribution path rather than maintaining disconnected copies.
04Handover
Detailed deliverables
- Design principles, token definitions, themes, and naming rules
- Figma library, agreed code components, and documentation
- Pilot screens, state and accessibility checks, and governance and migration guides
05Before implementation
Questions before implementation
- Target products and existing Figma and frontend assets
- Supported frameworks, brands, themes, and languages
- Initial shared screens and the future library owners
How your project moves forward
Discover
Understand your goals, workflows, and operating environment.
Define
Define features, priorities, and integration requirements.
Build
Build the agreed scope and review progress together.
Launch & Operate
Prepare testing, deployment, and operational handover.
Let’s discuss your project
Tell us what you want to build or improve
Our team will review your request and reply by email